It’s Easy to Save Your Home from Medicaid

An applicant must have limited assets to be eligible for Medicaid. In most cases, owning a home will not disqualify the applicant.  In order to keep the home in the family and not lose equity in it to the state of Texas upon the Medicaid recipient’s death, a Transfer on Death deed will be required.

Medicaid’s 5-Year Lookback Rule

When applying for Medicaid, applicants must disclose all transfers of assets made within the previous 5 years. The purpose of this rule is to disqualify applicants who give away all their wealth in order to impoverish themselves to become Medicaid eligible.   

In short, making a gift of the home (and any other assets) might keep the property in the family, but it can disqualify the donor from receiving Medicaid.

Medicaid Reimbursement

In Texas, Medicaid recipients must reimburse the state of Texas out of their estates when they die.  If the recipient’s home passes through his estate, it will be subject to the state’s claim for reimbursement. 

Section 373.203(a) of Title 1 of the Texas Administrative Code expressly limits Medicaid reimbursement to estates as follows:

The Medicaid Estate Recovery Program (MERP) may file or present a: Class 7 probate claim under §298, Claims Against Estates of Decedents, Texas Probate Code, against the estate of deceased Medicaid recipients in accordance with the priorities contained in §322, Classification of Claims against Estates of Decedents, Texas Probate Code.

Notably, if the home is not part of the recipient’s estate when he dies, it will not be subject to reimbursement.  To avoid the home being part of his estate, the recipient can make a gift of it, but as stated above, it can result in ineligibility for Medicaid.

In any event, now it is clear that the task at hand is to save the equity in the home by insuring it passes to family members outside of the Medicaid recipients estate and in a manner that will not disqualify him from receiving Medicaid or other public benefits.

This can be done via a non-probate transfer.

Probate vs. Non-probate Transfers

When a person dies, his estate will consist of all assets owned at the time of death, except assets which are transferred outside of the person’s estate.

For example, life insurance which is payable to a beneficiary upon the insured’s death passes outside of the insured’s estate. Likewise, bank accounts set up as “pay on death” (POD) accounts to named beneficiaries also pass outside of the account-holder’s estate.

These types of transfers are known as “non-probate transfers.”  There are many other types of non-probate transfers, and this article does not attempt to list all of them.  The main purpose is to make a simple distinction between probate and non-probate transfers.  Probate transfers are all transfers of property which occur upon the death of the owner, except for non-probate transfers.  Probate transfers occur through the decedent’s estate, and as stated above, such property will be subject to the state’s claim for reimbursement.

The key takeaway is that property which passes upon death by way of a non-probate transfer is not considered to be property of the decedent’s estate. 

Ladybird Deed

A type of deed called a “Ladybird deed” is one way in which Medicaid recipients try to keep their homes out of their estates.  Ladybird deeds are widely used, but this does not mean they are without controversy.

On the one hand, the applicant does not want to become ineligible for having made a gift during the lookback period. On the other hand, the Ladybird deed often reserves a right of the applicant to sell or mortgage the property and keep the proceeds. This hardly sounds like anything was transferred at all – meaning it could cause inclusion of the home within the applicant’s probate estate.

Suffice it to say, the Ladybird Deed is a clever device, but there has been some degree of uncertainty as to their effectiveness.

Texas’ Solution: the Transfer on Death Deed

Chapter 114 of the Texas Estates Code was created to alleviate these concerns .  It enables families to preserve their home equity by using a Transfer on Death (TOD) deed.

By giving a TOD deed, the Medicaid recipient retains all rights of ownership during his lifetime. He can sell the property. He can mortgage the property. He continues to receive all benefits of home ownership protections and property tax exemptions.  He can even revoke the TOD deed.

Section 114.101 states:

During a transferor’s life, a transfer on death deed does not:

(1) affect an interest or right of the transferor or any other owner, including:

(A) the right to transfer or encumber the real property that is the subject of the deed;

(B) homestead rights in the real property, if applicable; and

(C) ad valorem tax exemptions, including exemptions for residence homestead, persons 65 years of age or older, persons with disabilities, and veterans;

(2) affect an interest or right of a transferee of the real property that is the subject of the deed, even if the transferee has actual or constructive notice of the deed;

(3) affect an interest or right of a secured or unsecured creditor or future creditor of the transferor, even if the creditor has actual or constructive notice of the deed;

(4) affect the transferor’s or designated beneficiary’s eligibility for any form of public assistance, subject to applicable federal law;

(5) constitute a transfer triggering a “due on sale” or similar clause;

(6) invoke statutory real estate notice or disclosure requirements;

(7) create a legal or equitable interest in favor of the designated beneficiary; or

(8) subject the real property to claims or process of a creditor of the designated beneficiary.

Notice that Section 114.101(4) expressly states a TOD deed will not affect the transferor’s eligibility for public benefits.  

Section 114.106(b) makes clear that the property will not be considered as part of the recipient’s estate.  It states:

… real property transferred at the transferor’s death by a transfer on death deed is not considered property of the probate estate for any purpose, including for purposes of Section 531.077, Government Code.

Section 531.077 of the Texas Government Code is the statute which provides that the state of Texas will seek Medicaid reimbursement from the estates of decedents.  It states:

Sec. 531.077. RECOVERY OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. (a) The executive commissioner shall ensure that Medicaid implements 42 U.S.C. Section 1396p(b)(1).

(b) The Medicaid account is an account in the general revenue fund. Any funds recovered by implementing 42 U.S.C. Section 1396p(b)(1) shall be deposited in the Medicaid account. Money in the account may be appropriated only to fund long-term care, including community-based care and facility-based care.

As stated at the beginning of this article, Section 373.203(a) of Title 1 of the Texas Administrative Code is the rule which limits reimbursement to the recipient’s estate.   As long as the property is not considered to be a part of the recipient’s estate, it will pass free from the state’s reimbursement claims.

In conclusion, every homeowner who receives Medicaid benefits should execute and file a Transfer on Death deed in order to preserve the home’s equity for his or her beneficiaries.

Can You Trust Your Trust… to Save You Taxes?

There are good reasons why you might want to leave part of your estate in trust. Maybe an intended beneficiary is not a good money manager and will blow through your estate if given the chance. Trusts can be used to limit his or her access to trust assets and income.

Trusts can do even more than that. Similar to the corporate form of doing business, trusts can protect assets from the creditors of your beneficiaries.

In addition, trusts can be used to provide for a series of generations, such as to your children for their lives and then, to your grandchildren. This type of design can have the effect of keeping property “in the family” as opposed to winding its way through the in-laws’ families after a generation or two.

There are many other reasons why trusts might be appropriate, but they are not necessarily well-suited to income and estate tax avoidance. This article will explore some basic tax issues which are in play.

History of the Federal Estate Tax Exemption

Check out this chart showing how the federal estate tax exemption amount has risen since 1997:

In just 23 years, the exemption increased from $600,000 to almost $12 million! Not even the stock markets have boomed like this. Moreover, there hasn’t been a down year yet – not even in 2009-2011 when Democrats held the White House and both chambers of Congress.

This massive acceleration in the federal estate tax exemption has changed the tax planning paradigm completely. Think about all those people who made estate plans back in 2008 and earlier. Many of those outdated plans have not only become obsolete, but they are actually tax traps that can easily cost a person hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions. Keep reading, and it will become very obvious why this is the case.

Let’s examine a typical trust plan.

Assume Ted Testator has a taxable estate. He wishes to leave all of his estate to his only child, Charles, who in turn will leave his estate to his children (Ted’s grandchildren).

Ted’s estate will be taxed upon his death. If Ted leaves everything to Charles, the same property will be taxed again upon Charles’ death (assuming Charles will also have a taxable estate).

Generation Skipping

To avoid taxing the property twice, Ted can leave everything directly to his grandchildren. This is called “generation skipping.” The IRS is aware of this strategy, and the tax laws permit it to a limited extent. Generation skipping transfer taxes are beyond the scope of this article, but the simple generation skipping plan described above easily makes the point that double taxation can be avoided.

Let’s say Ted does not want to bypass Charles completely. Trusts can be used to skip Charles without really skipping Charles. A typical trust plan for Ted will leave everything in trust, naming Charles as an income beneficiary for life, and distributing the property to the grandchildren outright after Charles dies. Charles is also named as the trustee, and he is permitted to pay trust principle to himself for his health, education, maintenance, and support (HEMS).

For all practical purposes, this type of trust gives Charles virtually complete control over the trust property. It’s like he owns it… but he doesn’t! It’s not part of his estate when he dies, and no estate tax will apply. Mission accomplished… or not?

This is where it gets slippery.

No Step-Up in Basis

While estate tax avoidance is accomplished, Charles does not own the property. It is in trust. This means, the property will not receive a step-up in basis when Charles dies. Basis is an important tax consideration not to be overlooked.

The basis of an asset is often its acquisition price. For example, if Ted purchased unimproved land in 1980 for $1 million and did not make improvements on it, its basis in 2020 is still $1 million – the price paid. If Ted sells the property for $7 million in 2020, there is a $6 million capital gain, and he will have to write a hefty check to Uncle Sam. This is income tax, not estate tax.

Instead of selling the property in 2020, assume Ted dies, and it goes into trust as mentioned above. As a result of his death, the property’s basis will be stepped-up to its fair market value at the time of Ted’s death (i.e., $7 million). If Charles, as the trustee of the trust, sells the property for $7 million, there will be no capital gain. That’s a lot of income tax saved. You can read more about the importance of a step-up in basis here.

So far, so good…

But What about when Charles Dies?

Suppose Charles dies in 2050, when the property – having been put into trust for his benefit – has greatly appreciated and is then worth $20 million. Since he was not the owner upon his death, the property will not receive a step-up. The basis remains at $7 million – the fair market value upon Ted’s death back in 2020. If the grandchildren sell the property after Charles’ death for $20 million in 2050, they will pay a large sum in taxes on their $13 million capital gain.

If Ted would have left the property outright to Charles, rather than in trust, the grandchildren would have enjoyed a step-up in basis upon Charles’ death. They could then sell the property for $20 million without incurring any capital gain tax liability.

But Charles’ Estate will Incur Estate Tax if He Owns the Property upon His Death!

Who says? Although there is plenty of talk about how Congress or the next President is going to stick it the rich, history indicates this is somewhat unlikely.

Who knows what the estate tax exemption amount will be in 2050? It has risen from $600,000 in 1997 to over $11 million in 2018. Perhaps it could be $30-40 million by 2050. It might even be repealed.

The takeaway here is that when property will significantly appreciate over time, the step-up in basis upon death is very valuable and not to be overlooked. Given the way the estate tax exemption has been growing over the last two decades, it is possible that both estate taxes and capital gains taxes can be avoided. The trust, in our example, failed to accomplish that result since it forfeited the step-up in an effort to avoid estate taxes via generation-skipping. In essence, the skip – which was supposed to save the grandchildren millions of dollars – actually cost the grandchildren millions of dollars.

What about 2025?

In 2025, the current $11.58 million estate tax exemption amount is slated to expire. This means that unless Congress takes action to maintain or increase it, it will automatically revert to $5 million (adjusted for inflation) at the end of 2025. This sort of scenario can make people nervous.

For example, if Ted’s estate is currently valued at $8 million, no tax would be due if he dies prior to the end of 2025. If he dies in 2025, his estate will be subject to estate taxes unless Congress does something.

There are two things to note about this situation.

First, it happened before, in 2012. At that time, the exemption was $5 million, and it was going to revert to $1 million at the end of 2012. Congress did not take action as quickly as people had hoped, and in a last-minute frenzy, many wealthy people started gifting away property. Then, on January 1, 2013, before anyone had a chance to die that year, Congress passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act which extended the $5 million exemption amount.

Admittedly, hindsight is 20/20, but much of that gifting frenzy was for naught. Even worse, all those gifts transferred the owners’ basis to the donees. In essence, the step-up in basis was lost and there was no estate tax savings to be derived from the gifts. That’s a double-whammy for calling it wrong!

Another important point to note is that by leaving estate property to Charles outright, rather than in a generation-skipping trust, he will at least have the option to (i) retain it until death for the step-up in basis, or (ii) forego the step-up and gift it to avoid estate taxes on his death. Being able to make the right call at the closest point in time has massive advantages. Charles is much more likely to know the tax landscape in 2050 than is Ted. Unless there is a really good reason, Ted has no business trying to guess what the tax landscape will be 30 – 40 years down the road.

The generation-skipping trust in our example takes away Charles’ option to keep or gift the property. If the property is in trust, there will be no opportunity to receive a step-up in basis, regardless of what the estate tax and income tax landscape looks like in 2050. As has been shown, planning too rigidly too soon can be a very costly mistake.

This is not to say that all trusts are bad. As stated above, there are many good reasons to leave property in a trust. It is also possible to structure trusts in a manner to include property in a beneficiary’s estate. If the trust in our example gave Charles a testamentary general power of appointment over the trust property upon his death, then the property would be included in his estate and it would receive a step-up in basis, while protecting the property from his creditors during his lifetime.

A testamentary general power of appointment is the power to give the property upon death (typically by a will provision) to one’s estate or the creditors of one’s estate (among anyone else). The following is an example: “… in trust, naming Charles as an income beneficiary for life, and distributing the property upon his death to such persons as he shall designate in his last will and testament, provided that such persons may include only my grandchildren and the creditors of Charles’ estate.” (By not allowing Charles to appoint the property to his estate, this language prevents Charles from leaving the property to his spouse and keeps the property “in the family,” as described earlier.)

Again, however, an outright gift of the property to Charles would give him the option of keeping it in his estate to receive a step-up, or gifting it to avoid estate taxes. Sometimes, clients need this flexibility; sometimes, they don’t.

Conclusion

There is no crystal ball when it comes to planning for estate and income taxes. All we have to go on is a track record and the current state of politics. Looking at the chart above, the track record indicates that we should expect the exemption amount to rise substantially over the coming years – maybe even be repealed.

This article demonstrated how old and outdated tax planning strategies can do tremendously more harm than good. Trusts can be very useful, but they can also be very dangerous. Don’t just trust your trust to save you taxes. Verify it.

What is a Homestead?

Homestead
Chapter 41 of the Texas Property Code deals with homestead exemptions.
Section 41.001(b) of the Texas Property Code provides that a homestead is subject to a foreclosure or execution sale by creditors only for the following types of debts:
(1) purchase money;
(2) taxes on the property;
(3) work and material used in constructing improvements on the property if contracted for in writing as provided by Sections 53.254(a), (b), and (c);
(4) an owelty of partition imposed against the entirety of the property by a court order or by a written agreement of the parties to the partition, including a debt of one spouse in favor of the other spouse resulting from a division or an award of a family homestead in a divorce proceeding;
(5) the refinance of a lien against a homestead, including a federal tax lien resulting from the tax debt of both spouses, if the homestead is a family homestead, or from the tax debt of the owner;
(6) an extension of credit that meets the requirements of Section 50(a)(6), Article XVI, Texas Constitution; and
(7) a reverse mortgage that meets the requirements of Sections 50(k)-(p), Article XVI, Texas Constitution.
For example, a person’s home will be protected even though he defaults on credit card debts, car loans, tort liability, student loans and many other types of debts.
In addition, the surviving spouse and minor children of the decedent are entitled to have the homestead set aside for their exclusive use and benefit, rent-free, for the duration of their lives. It doesn’t matter in whose name the property is titled as long as it is part of the decedent’s estate. In addition, it doesn’t matter whether the decedent’s will or the laws of intestacy leave the home to somebody else. (For more on the rights of survivors of decedents, see this article.)

Urban vs. Rural Homesteads

Section 41.002 defines the amount of property which qualifies either as an urban or rural homestead. It states:
Sec. 41.002. DEFINITION OF HOMESTEAD. (a) If used for the purposes of an urban home or as both an urban home and a place to exercise a calling or business, the homestead of a family or a single, adult person, not otherwise entitled to a homestead, shall consist of not more than 10 acres of land which may be in one or more contiguous lots, together with any improvements thereon.
(b) If used for the purposes of a rural home, the homestead shall consist of:
(1) for a family, not more than 200 acres, which may be in one or more parcels, with the improvements thereon; or
(2) for a single, adult person, not otherwise entitled to a homestead, not more than 100 acres, which may be in one or more parcels, with the improvements thereon.
(c) A homestead is considered to be urban if, at the time the designation is made, the property is:
(1) located within the limits of a municipality or its extraterritorial jurisdiction or a platted subdivision; and
(2) served by police protection, paid or volunteer fire protection, and at least three of the following services provided by a municipality or under contract to a municipality:
(A) electric;
(B) natural gas;
(C) sewer;
(D) storm sewer; and
(E) water.
Notice that as long as the property meets the definition of a homestead, it is exempt, no matter what its value is and no matter how much equity is in it.

Unimproved Property

Unimproved property can qualify as homestead in many circumstances. The most important factor is the intent of the owner to use the property as a homestead as manifested by his objective conduct. For example, if the owner has entered into a contract to build a home on the property which he intends to live in, the property will typically qualify.  Intent is a fact-driven question and can be shown in many different circumstances.  In rural cases, unimproved property can qualify as part of a homestead even if the owner never intends to live there.  This is discussed below.

Multiple Tracts

While an urban homestead can consist of multiple tracts as long as they are contiguous, a rural homestead can consist of non-contiguous tracts – even when they are miles apart. A common situation is where a rural resident has separate acreage nearby which he uses to graze livestock, raise crops or engage in some similar use “for purposes of a rural home.”
There is case law holding that a family business, such as an auto body shop, qualifies as property used “for purposes of a rural home.” There is also case law holding that developing a rural tract into rental properties does not qualify when the owner does not live on the property. However, temporarily renting all or part of a homestead will not result in loss of its protections.
It is important to be very careful when changing the use of, or leasing, all or even a part of the homestead property. An attorney should be consulted to make sure the new use or lease will not be deemed “abandonment” of the homestead.

Abandonment

When a homestead is abandoned, it no longer maintains its exempt status. A classic example is when the owner keeps his existing home as a rental property and moves into a new home. The new home will qualify as a homestead, but the rental home no longer does. Abandonment can occur in a variety of ways.  However, for married persons, a spouse cannot abandon the homestead without the consent of the other spouse.  This rule is important in the context of separation and divorce.

Proceeds of Sale

Section 41.001(c) of the Property Code provides a window of opportunity for owners to sell their homes and reinvest the proceeds into a new home. The proceeds are exempt for 6 months from the date the home is sold.

Be Careful when Putting Homesteads into Trusts

It is a somewhat common estate planning practice to put one’s homestead in a trust – either in an inter vivos trust (made during life) or in a testamentary trust (a trust created in a person’s will).  Caution should be exercised when putting homes into trusts.  Unless the trust is a “qualifying trust,” the owner can lose the valuable property tax homestead exemption and worse, he can lose the homestead to general creditors.  (You can read more about “qualifying trusts” in this article.)

Don’t Lose Your Step-Up in Basis

There is a huge difference between gifting property, including your homestead, during your life versus holding onto it until death.  (Read more about it here.)
Homestead laws are varied and complex. It is always a good thing to know your rights so you can plan appropriately.